• Home
  • About
  • Policies
  • Contact
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • English 
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • Login
Advanced Search
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Tüm Akademik Yayınlar
  • Yayınlar - Eserler
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Tüm Akademik Yayınlar
  • Yayınlar - Eserler
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events.

Thumbnail
Date
2020-01-07
Author
Taşlıdere, B
Biberci, Keskin
Şentürk, H
İnce, ALİ TÜZÜN
Gülen, B
Koçhan, K
Advisor
Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:Timely identification of patients with acute pancreatitis who are likely to have a severe disease course is critical. Based on that, many scoring systems have been developed throughout the years. Although many of them are currently in use, none of them has been proven to be ideal. In this study, we aimed to compare the discriminatory power of relatively newer risk scores with the historical ones for predicting in-hospital major adverse events, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rate.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients who had been admitted due to acute pancreatitis were retrospectively investigated. Five risk scoring systems including HAPS, Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, and JSS were calculated using the data of the first 24h of admission. Predictive accuracy of each scoring system was calculated using the area under the receiver-operating curve method.RESULTS:Overall 690 patients were included in the study. In-hospital major adverse events were observed in 139 (20.1%) patients of whom, 19 (2.5%) died during hospitalization. 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission were observed in 22 (3.2%) and 27 (3.9%) patients respectively. Negative predictive value of each score was markedly higher compared to positive predictive values. Among all, JSS scoring system showed the highest AUC values across all end-points (0.80 for in-hospital major adverse events; 0.94 for in-hospital mortality; 0.91 for 30-day mortality). However, all five scoring systems failed to predict 30-day readmission.DISCUSSION:JSS was the best classifier among all five risk scoring systems particularly owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value
Subject
Biberci K., Taşlıdere B., Koçhan K., Gülen B., İnce A. T. , Şentürk H., -Comparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events.-, Gastroenterologia y hepatologia, 2020
URI
https://openaccess.bezmialem.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12645/13280
Collections
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu [3669]
  • Yayınlar - Eserler [9994]

BEZMIALEM VAKIF UNIVERSITY

About us |Policies | Library | Contact us | Send Feedback | Sitemap | Admin

Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı Vatan Caddesi 34093 Fatih, İstanbul / TURKEY
Copyright © Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bezmialem Institutional Repository, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

OpenAccess@BVU

Support by  UNIREPOS


Bezmialem Kütüphane


OpenAccess@BVU validated by OpenAIRE

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageRightsby AdvisorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageRightsby Advisor

My Account

LoginRegister

BEZMIALEM VAKIF UNIVERSITY

About us |Policies | Library | Contact us | Send Feedback | Sitemap | Admin

Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı Vatan Caddesi 34093 Fatih, İstanbul / TURKEY
Copyright © Bezmialem Vakıf Üniversitesi

Creative Commons Lisansı
Bezmialem Institutional Repository, Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

OpenAccess@BVU

Support by  UNIREPOS