Publication: Randomized Comparison of Multipolar, Duty-Cycled, Bipolar-Unipolar Radiofrequency Versus Conventional Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Common Atrial Flutter
Loading...
Program
relationships.isAuthorOf
Author
GUETTLER, Norbert
DOERR, Oliver
FRANZEN, Wolfgang
SOYDAN, Nedim
Bilgin, MEHMET
VOGELSANG, Pascal
PARAHULEVA, Mariana
TILLMANNS, Harald
STRACKE, Siegbert
Advisor
Language
Type
Publisher
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
Methods: Patients presenting to our department with symptomatic, typical AFL were enrolled consecutively and randomized to conventional RF ablation with an 8-mm tip catheter (ConvRF) or a duty-cycled, bipolar-unipolar RF generator delivering power to a hexapolar tip-versatile ablation catheter (T-VAC) group. For both groups, the procedural endpoint was bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block.
Description
Source
Keywords
Keywords
Citation
ERDOGAN A., GUETTLER N., DOERR O., FRANZEN W., SOYDAN N., Bilgin M., VOGELSANG P., PARAHULEVA M., TILLMANNS H., STRACKE S., et al., -Randomized Comparison of Multipolar, Duty-Cycled, Bipolar-Unipolar Radiofrequency Versus Conventional Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Common Atrial Flutter-, JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, cilt.21, ss.1109-1113, 2010