Publication:
Comparison of Single and Double Incision Repair Techniques in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKAPICIOĞLU, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorPulatkan, Anil
dc.contributor.authorUÇAN, VAHDET
dc.contributor.authorTEZGEL, OKAN
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Kerem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKAPICIOĞLU, MEHMET
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUÇAN, VAHDET
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTEZGEL, OKAN
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBİLSEL, İSMAIL KEREM
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T20:59:08Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T20:59:08Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to compare the complications and functional outcomes of single versus doubleincision repair techniques for the treatment of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, patients with distal biceps brachii tendon rupture who were treated with a single or doubleincision repair technique were included in this retrospective study. Range of motion (ROM) and Mayo elbow performance scores (MEPS) were evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients with a mean age of 45.6±6.4 years (range: 34-58 years) who underwent single (n=9) and double (n=8) incision techniques were included in this study. The mean followup was 33±10.5 months (range: 24-62 months). Preoperative and postoperative ROM and MEPS were similar between two groups (p>0.05). In the single incision repair technique group, 3 patients had lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN) palsy and 1 patient was re-operated due to re-rupture. In the double incision repair technique group, 1 patient had posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) palsy and 1 patient had hematoma that did not require surgical drainage. No significant differences were detected in terms of complications (p=0.62). Conclusion: Good functional results were obtained after both single and double incision techniques for the treatment of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture. Both single and double incision techniques were reliable however LACN was at risk in single incision technique and PIN in double incision technique.
dc.identifier.citationKapıcıoğlu M, Pulatkan A, Uçan V, Tezgel O, Bilsel K. Comparison of Single and Double Incision Repair Techniques in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture. Bezmialem Science 2022;10(4):409-14
dc.identifier.doi10.14235/bas.galenos.2021.6479
dc.identifier.trdizin1167829
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/31028
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000849963300004
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDistal biceps tendon
dc.subjecttendon rupture
dc.subjectsurgical repair
dc.subjectsingle incision
dc.subjectdouble incision
dc.titleComparison of Single and Double Incision Repair Techniques in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id5fc76f8c-f22c-442b-8965-52f48611ed83
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication33bea6eb-2819-4537-8544-beab26dc66f0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4540a88e-e631-4f1b-8c96-1ec7ae719878
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa89b4cd2-0dd1-4e31-a9ee-6192a8147cca
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdb1859ad-a3b3-4299-8b42-89a62b377d7d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydb1859ad-a3b3-4299-8b42-89a62b377d7d
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of Single and Double Incision Repair Techniques in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture.pdf
Size:
635.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler
Bezmialem Science Koleksiyonu
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu