Publication:
Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTEPELER, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorAKMAN, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorSILAY, Mesrur Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, MUZAFFER
dc.contributor.authorErsoz, CEVPER
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, SENAD
dc.contributor.authorARMAGAN, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorSARICA, Kemal
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAKÇAY, MUZAFFER
dc.contributor.institutionauthorERSÖZ, CEVPER
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKALKAN, SENAD
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-30T00:16:54Z
dc.date.available2020-10-30T00:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractThe micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) is a recently introduced percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) technique that is performed through a 4.8Fr all-seeing needle. We aimed to measure the intrarenal pelvic pressure (IPP) during microperc and compare it with the levels of conventional PNL. A total of 20 patients with 1- to 3-cm renal calculi resistant to shock wave lithotripsy were treated either with microperc (Group-1, n: 10) or conventional PNL (Group-2, n: 10) by the same surgical team. The IPP was measured during different stages (entrance into the collecting system, stone fragmentation, and before termination) of the procedures by an urodynamic machine using the 6Fr ureteral catheter. All the variables were statistically compared between the two groups. The demographic values of the patients were similar. The operation time and duration of hospitalization were significantly prolonged in conventional PNL group (p = 0.034, p = 0.01, respectively). The mean drop in hematocrit levels was significantly lower in microperc group (3.5 +/- A 1.5 vs. 1.8 +/- A 0.8; p = 0.004). The IPP was significantly higher in microperc group during all steps of the procedure. The highest level of the IPP was measured as 30.3 +/- A 3.9 and 20.1 +/- A 3.1 mmHg in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p < 0.0001). However, the complication and success rates were found comparable. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the level of IPP is significantly increased during microperc compared to conventional PNL. Microperc should be used cautiously in cases with impaired drainage of the collecting system.
dc.identifier.citationTEPELER A., AKMAN T., SILAY M. S. , Akcay M., Ersoz C., Kalkan S., ARMAGAN A., SARICA K., -Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy-, UROLITHIASIS, cilt.42, ss.275-279, 2014
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00240-014-0646-3
dc.identifier.pubmed24522489
dc.identifier.scopus84904693513
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/27162
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000336383500013
dc.titleComparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idf039b9c6-99d5-4646-9d78-ad348fcc3d8c
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication45d68bc0-abbf-4946-8bf4-1653e7a5f499
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2affc51c-246b-4233-95f2-2198aae6b480
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5001de04-30d2-46b4-9d55-f4db0093202a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2affc51c-246b-4233-95f2-2198aae6b480
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler