Publication:
Could intermittent change of conventional dressing affect risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAghazada, Aghamazahir
dc.contributor.authorALIYEV, ORKHAN
dc.contributor.authorDEMİRKIRAN, CEMİL BURAK
dc.contributor.authorUZER, GÖKÇER
dc.contributor.authorCitak, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorTUNCAY, İBRAHİM
dc.contributor.authorYILDIZ, FATİH
dc.contributor.institutionauthorALIYEV, ORKHAN
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAGHAZADAA, AGHAMAZAHIR
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDEMİRKIRAN, CEMİL BURAK
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUZER, GÖKÇER
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTUNCAY, İBRAHİM
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYILDIZ, FATİH
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T20:59:06Z
dc.date.available2021-07-20T20:59:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most dreaded and challenging complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of keeping the dressing without change on the occurrence of PJI in patients undergoing TJA. Methods 4877 Patients with a minimum follow-up of 90 days were included to investigate the effect of dressing on the PJI occurring within 3 months of surgery. Patients were divided into two consecutive groups as the intermittent change of traditional dressing (group 1-before 2019) and keeping dressing for 5 days without change (group 2-after 2019). A backward stepwise logistic regression model was used to estimate independent risk factors for PJI. Results Group 1 and group 2 consisted of 4172 and 705 patients, and the numbers of diagnosed PJI cases in the groups were 40 (1.0%) and 10 (1.4%), respectively (p = 0.1). The backward stepwise logistic regression model analysis revealed that keeping the dressing unchanged and removing it after the first week postoperatively was not an independent risk factor for the occurrence of PJI. Older age, diabetes mellitus and coronary artery diseases were independent risk factors for PJI (p < 0.05). Conclusion Our study results present, that intermittent change of conventional dressing is unnecessary, because it does not decrease the risk of PJI after TJA.
dc.identifier.citationALIYEV O., Aghazada A., DEMİRKIRAN C. B. , UZER G., Citak M., TUNCAY İ., YILDIZ F., -Could intermittent change of conventional dressing affect risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty?-, ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00402-021-04061-1
dc.identifier.pubmed34247306
dc.identifier.trdizintrdizin
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/29071
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000671648500001
dc.titleCould intermittent change of conventional dressing affect risk of periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id1d991cf6-4fee-4a9c-b6c1-755cc779f911
local.publication.goal03 - Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0e9826fe-cfad-4f83-b18b-f6640771f847
relation.isAuthorOfPublication73aae78c-b858-4743-b572-5662ca1fca83
relation.isAuthorOfPublication66105fe8-c226-4620-abe0-7fd7783a08ff
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2ac6eb83-fe07-4a95-8352-af58807d1d60
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3e190620-9fed-4601-b2d2-56f6d609e355
relation.isAuthorOfPublication62fa4380-d04e-462f-964d-3d586ffd68dc
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery62fa4380-d04e-462f-964d-3d586ffd68dc
relation.isGoalOfPublication9c198c48-b603-4e2f-8366-04edcfc1224c
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9c198c48-b603-4e2f-8366-04edcfc1224c
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler
TR Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu