Publication:
The effect of incentive spirometry with early pulmonary rehabilitation on hospital stay of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation

dc.contributor.authorKaya M.
dc.contributor.authorKulli H. D.
dc.contributor.authorUcgun H.
dc.contributor.authorZeren M.
dc.contributor.authorOKYALTIRIK F.
dc.contributor.authorGurses H. N.
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T21:36:39Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Incentive spirometry (IS) is a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and accessible device used peri-postoperative period for prevention or management of complications via maintaining maximum inhalation and open collapsed alveoli and resolving atelectasis. Although early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is known to reduce the length of stay (LOS), it is controversial whether the addition of IS provides a further contribution. This study aimed to investigate whether using IS in addition to early PR in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation reduces LOS and whether it is a safe technique by assessing hemodynamic responses. METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) during hospitalization were randomized to an early PR group and an additional IS group (PR + IS). LOS (days), pre-, and postsession hemodynamic responses were recorded. RESULTS: The LOS was significantly lower in the PR + IS (5.34 days) group than in the PR group (7.17 days) (P = 0.026). Changes in respiratory rate (breaths/min) and oxygen saturation (%) were within the well-tolerated interval in both groups and there was a statistically significant difference in the PR + IS group (P > 0.001). Other hemodynamic changes were also within well-tolerated intervals, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The usage of IS in addition to early PR in patients with AECOPD reduced LOS by approximately 1 day compared to PR alone. Furthermore, no significant signs of intolerance were observed, suggesting that IS was well-tolerated, similar to PR alone.
dc.identifier.citationKaya M., Kulli H. D., Ucgun H., Zeren M., OKYALTIRIK F., Gurses H. N., "The effect of incentive spirometry with early pulmonary rehabilitation on hospital stay of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation", Annals of Thoracic Medicine, cilt.20, sa.4, ss.239-245, 2025
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/atm.atm_246_24
dc.identifier.issn1817-1737
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus105019687912
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105019687912&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/41378
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001597542100003
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectGöğüs Hastalıkları ve Allerji
dc.subjectKardiyoloji
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectInternal Medicine Sciences
dc.subjectChest Diseases and Allergy
dc.subjectCardiovascular
dc.subjectSurgery Medicine Sciences
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (Med)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectCerrahi
dc.subjectSolunum Sistemi
dc.subjectKalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemleri
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (Med)
dc.subjectClinical Medicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectRespiratory System
dc.subjectCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
dc.subjectAkciğer ve Solunum Tıbbı
dc.subjectKardiyoloji ve Kardiyovasküler Tıp
dc.subjectPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
dc.subjectCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.subjectAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.subjecthemodynamic responses
dc.subjectincentive spirometry
dc.subjectlength of stay
dc.subjectpulmonary rehabilitation
dc.titleThe effect of incentive spirometry with early pulmonary rehabilitation on hospital stay of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id9d6a56e4-74c9-4b93-b697-26fe6ec0f756

Files