Publication:
Comparison of Conventional Syringe, CanalBrush, EndoActivator, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange-Brown Precipitate: An In Vitro Study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDincer, ASİYE NUR
dc.contributor.authorGuneser, MEHMET BURAK
dc.contributor.authorARSLAN, Dilara
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGÜNEŞER, MEHMET BURAK
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDİNÇER, ASİYE NUR
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T14:36:36Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T14:36:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the various techniques for removing precipitate formed after irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Background data: It is still unclear whether different irrigant activation systems can effectively remove precipitate that is firmly attached to the root canal walls. Methods: Eighty-two extracted single-rooted human teeth were instrumented by using the ProTaper rotary system. The roots were irrigated with 5% NaOCl and then 2% CHX to form orange-brown precipitate on the root canal walls. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally, and the amount of precipitate on the canal walls was measured under a stereomicroscope at 15xmagnification before the root halves were reassembled. Then, conventional syringe irrigation (CSI), CanalBrush (CB), EndoActivator (EA) system, photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and manual instrumentation (MI) techniques were used to remove the precipitate, during which 5mL of distilled water was used for 1min. The amount of precipitate remaining on the canal walls was measured, and the percentage of precipitate removed was calculated. Data were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (p=0.05). Results: All experimental groups contained residual precipitate. The precipitate was more effectively removed in the MI group than in the other groups (p0.05). Conclusions: None of the techniques used was able to completely remove the orange-brown precipitate from the root canal surfaces.
dc.identifier
dc.identifier.citationGuneser M. B. , Dincer A. N. , ARSLAN D., -Comparison of Conventional Syringe, CanalBrush, EndoActivator, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange-Brown Precipitate: An In Vitro Study-, PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, cilt.35, ss.311-316, 2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2016.4248
dc.identifier.pubmed28186862
dc.identifier.scopus85020439796
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/4273
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000403059900005
dc.language.isoen
dc.titleComparison of Conventional Syringe, CanalBrush, EndoActivator, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, and Manual Instrumentation in Removing Orange-Brown Precipitate: An In Vitro Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.journalnameTurkish Journal of Surgery
local.avesis.id67d87050-0898-41ba-a10e-abbaa04b521d
local.avesis.response4143
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd82912f1-caa4-440e-93db-22fdf33bcc0d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication280079fc-4c47-445a-94a7-4224ec2adeb5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd82912f1-caa4-440e-93db-22fdf33bcc0d
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler
Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi