Publication:
Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery

Placeholder

Organizational Units

Program

Authors

Sevket, OSMAN
Ates, SEDA
MOLLA, Taner
OZKAL, Fulya
Uysal, Omer
Dansuk, RAMAZAN

Advisor

Language

Publisher

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of 2 suturing techniques (single versus double layer) on healing of the uterine scar after a cesarean delivery. Methods: In the present randomized, prospective study, 36 women with a term pregnancy who had an elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to closure of the uterine incision with a single-layer locked suture or with a double-layer locked/unlocked suture. Six months after the operation, the integrity of the cesarean scar at the uterine incision site was assessed by hydrosonography. The healing ratio and the thickness of the residual myometrium covering the defect were calculated as markers of uterine scar healing. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of estimated blood loss, operation time, or additional hemostatic suture. However, the mean thickness of the residual myometrium covering the defect was 9.95 +/- 1.94 mm after a double-layer closure and 7.53 +/- 2.54 mm after a single-layer closure (P = 0.005). The mean healing ratio was significantly higher after a double-layer closure (0.83 +/- 0.10) than after a single-layer closure (0.67 +/- 0.15; P = 0.004). Conclusion: A double-layer locked/unlocked closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery decreases the risk of poor uterine scar healing. (C) 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Source:

Keywords:

Keywords

Citation

Sevket O., Ates S., MOLLA T., OZKAL F., Uysal O., Dansuk R., -Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery-, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, cilt.125, ss.219-222, 2014

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details


Sustainable Development Goals