Publication:
Traditional Versus Dual Lumen Microcatheter-Assisted Parallel Wiring in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry

dc.contributor.authorMutlu D.
dc.contributor.authorStrepkos D.
dc.contributor.authorSer O. S.
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho P. E. P.
dc.contributor.authorAlexandrou M.
dc.contributor.authorJalli S.
dc.contributor.authorAzzalini L.
dc.contributor.authorYbarra L.
dc.contributor.authorAlaswad K.
dc.contributor.authorJaffer F. A.
dc.contributor.authoret al.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-12T21:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-10
dc.description.abstractBackground: The effectiveness and safety of traditional versus dual lumen microcatheter (DLMC)-assisted parallel wiring in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. AimsTo compare traditional versus dual lumen microcatheter (DLMC)-assisted parallel wiring. Methods: We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics and outcomes of traditional versus DLMC-assisted parallel wiring after failed antegrade wiring (AW) in a large, multicenter CTO PCI registry. Results: Among 1353 CTO PCIs with failed AW with a single wire, traditional parallel wiring (n = 1081) or DLMC-assisted parallel wiring (n = 272) were utilized at the operator\"s discretion. The baseline characteristics of patients were similar in both groups except for higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and lower prevalence of hypertension, prior heart failure, prior MI and cerebrovascular disease in DLMC patients. Lesions in the DLMC group were more likely to have proximal cap ambiguity, side branch at the proximal cap, blunt/no stump, moderate/severe calcification, and had higher J-CTO score (2.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.3, p < 0.001). Technical (87.1% vs. 74.3%, p < 0.001) and procedural (83.8% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.001) success and the incidence of in-hospital major cardiac adverse events (MACE) (4.8% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.020) were higher in the DLMC group. In propensity score matching analysis, DLMC-assisted wiring was associated with higher technical success (odds ratio [OR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.54, p = 0.002) and no significant difference in MACE (OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.89-4.50, p = 0.093). Conclusions: In lesions that could not be crossed with AW, DLMC-assisted parallel wiring was associated with a higher likelihood of technical success, without an increased risk of MACE, compared with traditional parallel wiring.
dc.identifier.citationMutlu D., Strepkos D., Ser O. S., Carvalho P. E. P., Alexandrou M., Jalli S., Azzalini L., Ybarra L., Alaswad K., Jaffer F. A., et al., "Traditional Versus Dual Lumen Microcatheter-Assisted Parallel Wiring in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry", CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.31472
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.pubmed40065565
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/40523
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001440930300001
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKardiyoloji
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectInternal Medicine Sciences
dc.subjectCardiovascular
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectKalp Ve Kalp Damar Sistemleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (Med)
dc.subjectCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
dc.subjectClinical Medicine
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (Med)
dc.subjectKardiyoloji ve Kardiyovasküler Tıp
dc.subjectCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.titleTraditional Versus Dual Lumen Microcatheter-Assisted Parallel Wiring in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id0dfc06a4-83de-4864-a1cb-24a78e1e8f6a

Files