Publication:
Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Autologous Fascial Sling

dc.contributor.authorBlaivas, Jerry G.
dc.contributor.authorSimma-Chiang, Vannita
dc.contributor.authorGul, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorDayan, Linda
dc.contributor.authorKALKAN, Senad
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Melissa
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKALKAN, SENAD
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T20:23:14Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T20:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractThis article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author-s outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author-s opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI.
dc.identifier.citationBlaivas J. G. , Simma-Chiang V., Gul Z., Dayan L., KALKAN S., Daniel M., -Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Autologous Fascial Sling-, UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, cilt.46, ss.41-54, 2019
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.014
dc.identifier.pubmed30466701
dc.identifier.scopus85056762371
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/24747
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000454469100006
dc.titleSurgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence Autologous Fascial Sling
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.ide2b0c2f2-726e-4bcc-a31a-efa491a807ee
local.indexed.atPubMed
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5001de04-30d2-46b4-9d55-f4db0093202a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5001de04-30d2-46b4-9d55-f4db0093202a

Files