Publication:
Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: A retrospective comparison of griggs’ forceps,percutwist, and single dilator as ciaglia dilational tracheostomy Yatakbasi perkütan trakeostomi;griggs’ forceps, percutwist ve ciaglia dilatasyonel trakeostomi yöntemlerinin retrospektif karsilastirilmasi

dc.contributor.authorTürkmen Ü. A.
dc.contributor.authorMoralar D. G.
dc.contributor.authorErsoy A.
dc.contributor.authorÇakirgöz M.
dc.contributor.authorDenizli E.
dc.contributor.authorKara D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-22T21:50:20Z
dc.date.available2025-02-22T21:50:20Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the three different techniques of percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy (PDT) with Griggs’ forceps (Portex), PercuTwist (Rüsch) and Single Dilator as Ciaglia (Portex) with respect to their advantages (timing, intubation device) and the complications of tracheostomy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Material and Method: We performed 197 procedures of Griggs, PercuTwist, and single dilator mode percutaneous tracheostomy under general anesthesia, using a disposable percutaneous tracheostomy kit, in our clinic in the period from 2001 to 2013. The study evaluated intubation times, intubation equipment used, procedure durations, and complications.Results: No significant difference was determined in distribution in terms of the patients’ mean age and gender, and intubation device (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, procedure durations, and intubation time for the three techniques (p>0.05). Conclusion: Percutaneous dilation tracheostomy applied with any of the three techniques is shown to be equally effective and safe.
dc.identifier.citationTürkmen Ü. A., Moralar D. G., Ersoy A., Çakirgöz M., Denizli E., Kara D., "Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: A retrospective comparison of griggs’ forceps,percutwist, and single dilator as ciaglia dilational tracheostomy Yatakbasi perkütan trakeostomi;griggs’ forceps, percutwist ve ciaglia dilatasyonel trakeostomi yöntemlerinin retrospektif karsilastirilmasi", Nobel Medicus, cilt.15, sa.2, ss.57-62, 2019
dc.identifier.issn1305-2381
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus85077523345
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077523345&origin=inward
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/40361
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectFundamental Medical Sciences
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (Med)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp Genel & Dahili
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (Med)
dc.subjectClinical Medicine
dc.subjectMedicine General & Internal
dc.subjectGenel Tıp
dc.subjectGeneral Medicine
dc.subjectBedside percutaneous tracheostomy complications
dc.subjectGriggs’ forceps
dc.subjectPercutwist
dc.subjectSingle dilator as ciaglia
dc.subjectTracheostomy
dc.subjectTracheostomy methods
dc.titleBedside percutaneous tracheostomy: A retrospective comparison of griggs’ forceps,percutwist, and single dilator as ciaglia dilational tracheostomy Yatakbasi perkütan trakeostomi;griggs’ forceps, percutwist ve ciaglia dilatasyonel trakeostomi yöntemlerinin retrospektif karsilastirilmasi
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idc5e0d95a-33d7-448e-bb01-99c55ea29121
local.indexed.atScopus

Files