Publication: Vertical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision-Modified Stoppa Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures
dc.contributor.author | Kara D. | |
dc.contributor.author | ELMADAĞ N. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ali J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Misir A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cetin H. | |
dc.contributor.author | DEMİRKIRAN C. B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mraja H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Pulatkan A. | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | ELMADAĞ, NUH MEHMET | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | ALİ, JOTYAR | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | ÇETİN, HUZEYFE | |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | DEMİRKIRAN, CEMİL BURAK | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T21:50:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T21:50:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES:The aims of this study were to compare the patient and fracture characteristics, radiological, functional, and quality of life outcomes; the need for a lateral window approach and requirement of total hip arthroplasty; and complications in patients with simple and complex acetabular fractures who underwent a modified Stoppa approach through vertical and Pfannenstiel incisions.METHODS:Design:This was a retrospective comparison study.Setting:Level 1 trauma center.Patient Selection Criteria:Patients with acetabular fractures (A-O-/-O-T-A type 62A-B-C) treated with vertical (group V) or Pfannenstiel (group P) incision-modified Stoppa approach between 2010 and 2020 were included.Outcome Measures and Comparisons:Patient characteristics, radiological evaluations (reduction quality and posttraumatic osteoarthritis), patient functional outcomes [12-item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) physical component score, SF-12 mental component score, Harris Hip Score, and Merle d\"Aubigné-Postel], approach modifications and stratification by fracture type and complications were compared between those treated with vertical or Pfannenstiel incisions.RESULTS:One hundred four patients (mean age of 38.5 ± 14.3 years) were included. There was no significant difference between the Pfannenstiel or vertical groups regarding patient and fracture characteristics (P = 0.137), postoperative reduction quality (P = 0.130), or the mean functional and quality of life outcome scores at the last follow-up (P = 0.483 for the Harris Hip Score, P = 0.717 for the Merle d\"Aubigné-Postel score, P = 0.682 for the SF-12 physical component score, and P = 0.781 for the SF-12 mental component score). In group P, significantly more patients needed additional lateral incisions (40.8% vs. 10.9%; P 0.001) and total hip replacement procedures (12.2% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.049). The total, early, and late complication rates were significantly higher in group P (P 0.001, P = 0.034, and P = 0.049, respectively).CONCLUSIONS:Pfannenstiel incision was associated with higher complication rates than vertical incision in acetabular fractures treated through a modified Stoppa approach. Fracture complexity is associated with the need for a lateral window approach and total hip arthroplasty, as well as a worse functional and radiological outcome regardless of incision type. However, it was not associated with the development of intraoperative or postoperative complications.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kara D., ELMADAĞ N. M., Ali J., Misir A., Cetin H., DEMİRKIRAN C. B., Mraja H., Pulatkan A., "Vertical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision-Modified Stoppa Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures", Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, cilt.38, sa.3, ss.134-142, 2024 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/bot.0000000000002746 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 142 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0890-5339 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 38385973 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 85185813135 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 134 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185813135&origin=inward | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/39157 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Medicine | |
dc.subject | Surgery Medicine Sciences | |
dc.subject | Orthopedics and Traumatology | |
dc.subject | Health Sciences | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.subject | CERRAHİ | |
dc.subject | ORTOPEDİ | |
dc.subject | Clinical Medicine (MED) | |
dc.subject | CLINICAL MEDICINE | |
dc.subject | SURGERY | |
dc.subject | ORTHOPEDICS | |
dc.subject | Cerrahi | |
dc.subject | Ortopedi ve Spor Hekimliği | |
dc.subject | Surgery | |
dc.subject | Orthopedics and Sports Medicine | |
dc.subject | acetabular fracture | |
dc.subject | complex | |
dc.subject | complications | |
dc.subject | modified Stoppa | |
dc.subject | outcome | |
dc.subject | Pfannenstiel | |
dc.subject | vertical | |
dc.title | Vertical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision-Modified Stoppa Approach in the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures | |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.avesis.id | c4b3ca64-6d2f-4567-9b13-3b16ef96bb29 | |
local.indexed.at | PubMed | |
local.indexed.at | Scopus | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | e5474303-abd9-4b53-8bb0-7d0f5374fb77 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 078cc224-826e-4d45-8877-4408b0dd6dd6 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 35213ba5-0b61-464c-9d14-2c040aaef1b0 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 66105fe8-c226-4620-abe0-7fd7783a08ff | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | e5474303-abd9-4b53-8bb0-7d0f5374fb77 |