Publication:
Assesment of Opinions of Forensic Science Experts and Technicians On Global Pandemic Management Strategies Through SarsCov2 Pandemic

dc.contributor.authorUlutaş M.
dc.contributor.authorMelez İ. E.
dc.contributor.authorArslan M.
dc.contributor.institutionauthorMELEZ, İPEK ESEN
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-08T22:42:18Z
dc.date.available2023-01-08T22:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-23
dc.description.abstractThis study was implemented to assess the opinions of forensic science experts and techni cians of The Ministry of Justice Council of Forensic Medicine on global pandemic management strategies including new technologies and future scenarios through SARSCov2 pandemic. This prospective and descriptive research was carried out with a questionnair e that was asked to 244 personnel (forensic medicine specialist, forensic medicine resident, technician, other specialist from a different field, other specialist phsician) working at The Ministry of Justice Council of Forensic Medicine. The 40question su rvey included questions about participants’ level of knowledge perception about the pandemic and attitudes on measurestheir adequacynecessity, technological applications and the future of global management strategies. 93.8% (n=229) of the participants th ought they had knowledge about the pandemic and its transmission routes, 54.1% (n=132) found the applied pandemic management strategies effective and correct, and 76.6% (n =187) stated that it is necessary to use technological infrastructures in future sce narios. As a result, through hundreds of descriptive statictics results in 80 tables classified according to education level, occupation type and occupational experience level, in general, despite the changes in group tendencies according to different fact ors, the majority of participants were found to be obeying the routine necessities of the pandemic, hesitating on the global strategies, feeling closer to habitual technologies, feeling far to technologies which have never experienced before in daily life, giving answers with a high ratio of \"no opinion\" due to feeling obliged to give decisions gropely among unproven propabibilities or due to their hesitation on sharing their opinion even if they had an opinion. Moreover according to results, it was interpr eted that social engineering could easily be performed in any spesifically designed group.
dc.identifier.citationUlutaş M., Melez İ. E., Arslan M., \"Assesment of Opinions of Forensic Science Experts and Technicians On Global Pandemic Management Strategies Through SarsCov2 Pandemic\", 8th International Congress of Academic Research, 22 - 24 Haziran 2022, ss.194-195
dc.identifier.urihttps://avesis.bezmialem.edu.tr/api/publication/b8a41543-f58a-4fa4-9242-3d410c5a7534/file
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/34824
dc.relation.ispartof8th International Congress of Academic Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAdli Tıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectInternal Medicine Sciences
dc.subjectForensic Medicine (Medical Jurisprudence)
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTIP, YASAL
dc.subjectTIP, GENEL & DAHİLİ
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (MED)
dc.subjectCLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.subjectMEDICINE, LEGAL
dc.subjectMEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
dc.subjectGenel Sağlık Meslekleri
dc.subjectPatofizyoloji
dc.subjectSorunlar, Etik ve Hukuki Yönler
dc.subjectTemel Bilgi ve Beceriler
dc.subjectDeğerlendirme ve Teşhis
dc.subjectDahiliye
dc.subjectAile Sağlığı
dc.subjectTıp (çeşitli)
dc.subjectGenel Tıp
dc.subjectGeneral Health Professions
dc.subjectPathophysiology
dc.subjectIssues, Ethics and Legal Aspects
dc.subjectFundamentals and Skills
dc.subjectAssessment and Diagnosis
dc.subjectInternal Medicine
dc.subjectFamily Practice
dc.subjectMedicine (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Medicine
dc.titleAssesment of Opinions of Forensic Science Experts and Technicians On Global Pandemic Management Strategies Through SarsCov2 Pandemic
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idb8a41543-f58a-4fa4-9242-3d410c5a7534
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5810432e-e536-42e3-b5bf-8e2242b781de
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5810432e-e536-42e3-b5bf-8e2242b781de

Files