Publication:
Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results

dc.contributor.authorTUNCER, SAFA
dc.contributor.authorDEMİRCİ, MUSTAFA
dc.contributor.authorÖZTAŞ, SÜLEYMAN EVREN
dc.contributor.authorTEKÇE, NESLİHAN
dc.contributor.authorUYSAL, ÖMER
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUYSAL, ÖMER
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T21:29:22Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T21:29:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of occlusal carious restorations using nanofill and microhybrid composites, in combination with 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesives, in patients who were going to commence orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods: A total of 118 restorations for occlusal caries were conducted prior to orthodontic treatment. Occlusal restorations were performed both with Filtek Supreme XT (3M ESPE) and Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) before beginning orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic bands. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-year recalls. Results: None of the microhybrid (Filtek Z250) and nanofill (Filtek Supreme XT) composite restorations was clinically unacceptable with respect to color match, marginal discoloration, wear or loss of anatomical form, recurrent caries, marginal adaptation, or surface texture. A 100% success rate was recorded for both composite materials. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the clinical evaluation criteria between Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme XT restorations for each evaluation period. Conclusions: The composite restorations showed promising clinical results relating to color matching, marginal discoloration, wear or loss of anatomical form, recurrent caries, marginal adaptation, and surface texture at the end of the 5-year evaluation period.en
dc.identifier
dc.identifier.citationTUNCER S., DEMİRCİ M., ÖZTAŞ S. E. , TEKÇE N., UYSAL Ö., -Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results-, Restorative Dentistry Endodontics, cilt.42, ss.253, 2017
dc.identifier.pubmed29142873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/7426
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleMicrohybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities: five year results
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.journalnameSAKARYA TIP DERGİSİ
local.avesis.idb8ecd133-568d-4901-94f2-687c42e9c1ab
local.avesis.response7302
local.indexed.atPubMed
relation.isAuthorOfPublication19df24c5-c3e8-4158-8eed-717f885c608d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery19df24c5-c3e8-4158-8eed-717f885c608d

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
115- Microhybrid versus nanofill composite in combination with a three step etch and rinse adhesive in occlusal cavities five year results.pdf
Size:
370.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: