Publication: Dynamic versus nondynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) scoring of adnexal masses: a comparative performance analysis
| dc.contributor.author | PEKER A. A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | DÖNMEZ Z. | |
| dc.contributor.author | AKÇAY A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | TOPRAK H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gülteki̇n M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-11T21:37:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | AİM To compare the diagnostic performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) using dynamic and nondynamic contrast-enhanced protocols in the characterisation of adnexal masses. MATERİALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 369 patients (mean age, 43.6 ± 15 years) with 479 adnexal lesions who underwent pelvic MRI between January 2020 and March 2025. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in 97 lesions and nondynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 382. Two radiologists, with 8 and 4 years of experience, independently reviewed all examinations while blinded to clinical and histopathological data. Lesions scored as O-RADS 2–3 were classified as benign and O-RADS 4–5 as malignant. Histopathology or ≥12 months of imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for both protocols. Results Among 479 lesions, 302 (76.8%) were benign, 28 (7.1%) borderline, and 63 (16.0%) malignant. The dynamic protocol achieved a sensitivity of 97.4%, specificity of 93.2%, PPV of 90.2%, NPV of 98.2%, and accuracy of 94.8%. The nondynamic protocol showed comparable results (sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 94.6%, PPV 91.2%, NPV 97.9%, accuracy 95.0%), with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy ( P =0.794). Malignancy rates increased progressively with higher O-RADS categories in both protocols. Conclusion O-RADS MRI provides a reliable framework for risk stratification of adnexal masses. Nondynamic contrast-enhanced MRI achieves diagnostic performance equivalent to DCE-MRI and can be confidently used when dynamic acquisition is not feasible, supporting broader clinical adoption of simplified O-RADS MRI protocols. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | PEKER A. A., DÖNMEZ Z., AKÇAY A., TOPRAK H., Gülteki̇n M., "Dynamic versus nondynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) scoring of adnexal masses: a comparative performance analysis", Clinical Radiology, cilt.95, 2026 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.crad.2026.107255 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0009-9260 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 41702044 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 105030209207 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105030209207&origin=inward | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/41784 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 95 | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Tıp | |
| dc.subject | Dahili Tıp Bilimleri | |
| dc.subject | Nükleer Tıp | |
| dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
| dc.subject | Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Internal Medicine Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Nuclear medicine | |
| dc.subject | Health Sciences | |
| dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (Med) | |
| dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
| dc.subject | Radyoloji Nükleer Tıp ve Medikal Görüntüleme | |
| dc.subject | Clinical Medicine (Med) | |
| dc.subject | Clinical Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Radiology Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | |
| dc.subject | Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp ve Görüntüleme | |
| dc.subject | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging | |
| dc.title | Dynamic versus nondynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) scoring of adnexal masses: a comparative performance analysis | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| local.avesis.id | faef8604-79dc-44bc-804c-1d0f2334f2be |