Publication:
Comparison of a Novel Trephine Drill with Conventional Rotary Instruments for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKazancioglu, Hakki Oguz
dc.contributor.authorTek, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorEzirganli, Seref
dc.contributor.authorMihmanli, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T15:56:00Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T15:56:00Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare a newly designed trephine drill (SLA KIT, Neobiotech) with conventional rotary instruments for maxillary sinus floor elevation based on operative time, postoperative pain, and perforation rates. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients were treated with a bilateral sinus floor elevation procedure with rotary trephine and conventional instruments. One side was treated with conventional rotary instruments, while the contralateral side was treated with rotary trephine instruments, with a 2-week gap between surgeries. Operative time was measured with a chronometer in seconds as the time from soft tissue incision to primary closure of the incision with the last suture. Pain was scored on a 10-point visual analog scale at 24 hours after surgery. The presence of tears and perforations was determined by direct visualization and the Valsalva maneuver. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Operative time was shorter when the trephine drill was used (11.1 +/- 2.4 minutes) than with conventional rotary instruments (15.1 +/- 2.9 minutes). Sinus membrane perforation was observed in eight patients when conventional rotary instruments were used, while the trephine drill resulted in two sinus perforations. Mean pain scores were 2.01 +/- 0.11 after using the trephine drill and 2.25 +/- 0.76 when conventional rotary instruments were used. No significant difference was found in postoperative pain scores. Conclusion: The trephine drill technique may result in decreased perforation rates and operative time.
dc.identifier.citationKazancioglu H. O. , Tek M., Ezirganli S., Mihmanli A., -Comparison of a Novel Trephine Drill with Conventional Rotary Instruments for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation-, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, cilt.28, ss.1201-1206, 2013
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.2708
dc.identifier.scopus84899469924
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/23678
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000324733800019
dc.titleComparison of a Novel Trephine Drill with Conventional Rotary Instruments for Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id4e8d7926-6cfd-4da3-a957-24dd7c3cbbbf
local.publication.isinternational1
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler