Publication:
Comparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidus

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorERDIL, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorElmadag, NUH MEHMET
dc.contributor.authorPOLAT, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorTUNCER, Nejat
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorUcan, Vandet
dc.contributor.authorErkocak, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorSEN, Cengiz
dc.contributor.institutionauthorELMADAĞ, NUH MEHMET
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBİLSEL, İSMAIL KEREM
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUÇAN, VAHDET
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T12:46:57Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T12:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to compare the functional results of arthrodesis, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, and total joint replacement in hallux rigidus. The data from patients treated from 2006 to 2010 for advanced stage hallux rigidus were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 38 patients who had at least 2 years (range 24 to 66 months, mean 31.1) of follow-up were included in the present study. Of the 38 patients, 12 were included in the total joint replacement group (group A), 14 in the resurfacing hemiarthroplasty group (group B), and 12 in the arthrodesis group (group C). At the last follow-up visit, the functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society-Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Interphalangeal (AOFAS-HMI) scale, visual analog scale (VAS), and metatarsophalangeal range of motion. Significant improvements were seen in the AOFAS-HMI score, with a decrease in the VAS score in all 3 groups. According to the AOFAS-HMI score, no significant difference was found between groups A and B. However, in group C, the AOFAS-HMI scores were significantly lower than in the other groups owing to the lack of motion. According to the final VAS scores, no significant difference was found between groups A and B; however, the VAS score had decreased significantly more in group C than in the other groups. No major complications occurred in any of the 3 groups. After 2 years of follow-up, all the groups had good functional outcomes. Although arthrodesis is still the most reliable procedure, implant arthroplasty is also a good alternative for advanced stage hallux rigidus. (C) 2013 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.citationERDIL M., Elmadag N. M. , POLAT G., TUNCER N., Bilsel K., Ucan V., Erkocak O. F. , SEN C., -Comparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidus-, JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, cilt.52, ss.588-593, 2013
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.014
dc.identifier.pubmed23659913
dc.identifier.scopus84882617312
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/25040
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000324002900007
dc.titleComparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidus
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id00c1211a-0e24-46dd-aec3-c42542bb6e5d
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione5474303-abd9-4b53-8bb0-7d0f5374fb77
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationdb1859ad-a3b3-4299-8b42-89a62b377d7d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4540a88e-e631-4f1b-8c96-1ec7ae719878
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverydb1859ad-a3b3-4299-8b42-89a62b377d7d
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler