Publication:
Which Unicondylar Prosthesis Has Better Mid-Term Results: Fixed or Mobile?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBulbul, Ahmet Murat
dc.contributor.authorKUYUCU, ERSİN
dc.contributor.authorKara, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorKÜÇÜKDURMAZ, FATİH
dc.contributor.authorErdil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKÜÇÜKDURMAZ, FATİH
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T18:04:05Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T18:04:05Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: Osteoarthritis, which is one of the most common causes of pain and motion loss, is an important medical disease that particularly affects elderly people. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty treatment is still a challenge for obese and/or ACL deficient patients. In addition, surgeons face a challenge of deciding whether to perform either fixed or mobile insert design prosthesis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of fixed or mobile insert design prosthesis on the mid-term results of patients that we followed up for 8 years or more.
dc.identifier.citationBulbul A. M. , KUYUCU E., Kara A., KÜÇÜKDURMAZ F., Erdil M., -Which Unicondylar Prosthesis Has Better Mid-Term Results: Fixed or Mobile?-, JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM, cilt.6, ss.31-34, 2016
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/jarem.2015.863
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/23931
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382988800005
dc.titleWhich Unicondylar Prosthesis Has Better Mid-Term Results: Fixed or Mobile?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id6ea59c20-0c7a-46d3-94ad-28132486e77d
local.publication.goal16 - Barış, Adalet ve Güçlü Kurumlar
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5545e8b7-75a3-4fee-b2ed-53db0a437463
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5545e8b7-75a3-4fee-b2ed-53db0a437463
relation.isGoalOfPublication7e7ce1dc-9556-4fa2-b604-c2ba181d38b9
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7e7ce1dc-9556-4fa2-b604-c2ba181d38b9
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler