Person:
ERDOĞAN, EZGİ BAŞAK

Loading...
Profile Picture
Status
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Job Title
First Name
EZGİ BAŞAK
Last Name
ERDOĞAN
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • PublicationOpen Access
    The role of PET and MRI in evaluating the feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy.
    (2018-02-01) MALYA, FATMA ÜMİT; KADIOGLU, HÜSEYİN; BEKTASOGLU, HÜSEYİN KAZIM; Gucin, ZÜHAL; YILDIZ, S; GUZEL, MEHMET; ERDOGAN, EZGİ BAŞAK; YUCEL, S; ERSOY, YELİZ EMİNE; MALYA, FATMA ÜMİT; KADIOĞLU, HÜSEYİN; BEKTAŞOĞLU, HÜSEYİN KAZIM; GÜCİN, ZÜHAL; YILDIZ, ŞEYMA; GÜZEL, MEHMET; ERDOĞAN, EZGİ BAŞAK; ERSOY, YELIZ EMINE
    Abstract Objective: To investigate the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating the feasibility of skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with locally-advanced breast cancer (LABC) who will undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of PET and MRI compared with skin biopsy results before and after NAC treatment. Methods: Patients with LABC who were treated with NAC between November 2013 and November 2015 were included in this study. Demographic, clinical, radiological and histopathological features of the patients were recorded. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 52.6 years (range, 35– 70 years). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting skin involvement in LABC was 100%/10% (62%/ 85%) with MRI and 60%/80% (12%/92%) with PET before (after) NAC, respectively. When radiological skin involvement was assessed in relation to the final histopathological results, the preNAC PET results and histopathological skin involvement were not significantly different; and there was no difference between postNAC MRI and histopathological skin involvement. Conclusions: As preNAC PET and postNAC MRI more accurately determined skin involvement, it might be possible to use these two radiological evaluation methods together to assess patient suitability for skin-sparing mastectomy in selected patients.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    New Fetal Dose Estimates from F-18-FDG Administered During Pregnancy: Standardization of Dose Calculations and Estimations with Voxel-Based Anthropomorphic Phantoms
    (2016-11-01) Zanotti-Fregonara, Paolo; Chastan, Mathieu; Edet-Sanson, Agathe; Ekmekcioglu, Ozgul; Erdogan, EZGİ BAŞAK; Hapdey, Sebastien; Hindie, Elif; Stabin, Michael G.; ERDOĞAN, EZGİ BAŞAK
    Data from the literature show that the fetal absorbed dose from 18F-FDG administration to the pregnant mother ranges from 0.5E-2 to 4E-2 mGy/MBq. These figures were, however, obtained using different quantification techniques and with basic geometric anthropomorphic phantoms. The aim of this study was to refine the fetal dose estimates of published as well as new cases using realistic voxel-based phantoms. Methods: The 18F-FDG doses to the fetus (n = 19; 5-34 wk of pregnancy) were calculated with new voxel-based anthropomorphic phantoms of the pregnant woman. The image-derived fetal time-integrated activity values were combined with those of the mothers' organs from the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 106 and the dynamic bladder model with a 1-h bladder-voiding interval. The dose to the uterus was used as a proxy for early pregnancy (up to 10 wk). The time-integrated activities were entered into OLINDA/EXM 1.1 to derive the dose with the classic anthropomorphic phantoms of pregnant women, then into OLINDA/EXM 2.0 to assess the dose using new voxel-based phantoms. Results: The average fetal doses (mGy/MBq) with OLINDA/EXM 2.0 were 2.5E-02 in early pregnancy, 1.3E-02 in the late part of the first trimester, 8.5E-03 in the second trimester, and 5.1E-03 in the third trimester. The differences compared with the doses calculated with OLINDA/EXM 1.1 were +7%, +70%, +35%, and -8%, respectively. Conclusion: Except in late pregnancy, the doses estimated with realistic voxelwise anthropomorphic phantoms are higher than the doses derived from old geometric phantoms. The doses remain, however, well below the threshold for any deterministic effects. Thus, pregnancy is not an absolute contraindication of a clinically justified 18F-FDG PET scan.