Person:
ÇETİNKAYA, EZRA

Profile Picture
Status
Kurumdan Ayrılmıştır
Organizational Units
OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit
Job Title
First Name
EZRA
Last Name
ÇETİNKAYA
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Filters

2016 - 201912020 - 20221
Reset filters

Settings

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Primary diffuse leptomeningeal gliomatosis
    (2016-01-01) Çetinkaya, EZRA; ARALAŞMAK, AYŞE; TOPRAK, HÜSEYİN; YILDIZ, ŞEYMA; YURTSEVER, İSMAİL; ALKAN, ALPAY; ÇETİNKAYA, EZRA; ARALAŞMAK, AYŞE; TOPRAK, HÜSEYİN; YILDIZ, ŞEYMA; YURTSEVER, İSMAİL; ALKAN, ALPAY
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Follow-Up of High-Grade Glial Tumor; Differentiation of Posttreatment Enhancement and Tumoral Enhancement by DCE-MR Perfusion
    (2022-01-01T00:00:00Z) DÜNDAR, TOLGA TURAN; Cetinkaya, Ezra; YURTSEVER, İSMAİL; Uysal, Ömer; Aralaşmak, Ayşe; DÜNDAR, TOLGA TURAN; ÇETİNKAYA, EZRA; YURTSEVER, İSMAİL; UYSAL, ÖMER
    Purpose: To search for the utility of DCE-MRP to differentiate between posttreatment enhancement (PT) and tumoral enhancement (TM) in high-grade glial tumors. Materials and methods: Thirty-four patients with glioma (11 grade 3; 23 grade 4) were enrolled. Enhancement in the vicinity of the resection cavity demonstrated by DCE-MRP was taken into consideration. Based on the follow-up scans, reoperation or biopsy results, the enhancement type was categorized as PT or TM. Measurements were performed at the enhancing area near the resection cavity (ERC), nearby (NNA) and contralateral nonenhancing areas (CLNA). Perfusion parameters of the ERC were also subtracted from NNA and CLNA. Intragroup comparison (paired sample t-test) and intergroup comparison (Student's t-test) were made. Results: There were 7 PTs and 27 TMs. In the PT, the subtracted values of Ve and IAUC from the CLNA and NNA and the subtracted value of Kep from NNA were statistically different. In TM, all metrics were significantly different comparing the CLNA and NNA. Comparing PT with TM, Ktrans, IAUC, Kep, and subtracted values of Ktrans and IAUC from both NNA and CLNA were significantly different. Conclusions: In PT, only Ktrans values did not reveal any difference comparing NNA and CLNA. To differentiate PT from TM, Ktrans, Kep, IAUC, and subtracted values of Ktrans and IAUC from NNA and CLNA can be used. These findings are in concordance with literature.