2016-09-01, Tanriverdi, MÜBERRA, Mutluay, Fatma Karantay, TARAKCI, Devrim, GULER, Serhat, Iscan, AKIN, TANRIVERDİ, MÜBERRA, İŞCAN, AKIN

This study investigated the possible presence of sensory-motor developmental impairments in preschool children with epilepsy and explored epilepsy impact on their activities and quality of life and on the stress load of their family.

2022-06-01T00:00:00Z, Yalçınkaya, Özlem, YALÇINKAYA, ÖZLEM

2022-06-01T00:00:00Z, Canaslan, Hilal, Erdoğan, Özcan, Taşlıdere, Bahadır, ERDOĞAN, ÖZCAN, TAŞLIDERE, BAHADIR

Özet Bu çalışmanın amacı, İstanbul’da düzenlenen -Hastane Afet ve Acil Durum Planları (HAP) Uygulayıcı Eğitimleri-nin, kamu, özel ve üniversite hastaneleri çalışanlarının hastane afet ve acil durum planları konusunda bilgi düzeyine etkisini araştırmaktır. Afet SağlıkHizmetleri Birimi tarafından 61 kamu hastanesi, 162 özel hastane ve 22 üniversite hastanesi çalışanlarına üç yıllık süreç içerisinde verilen HAP uygulayıcı eğitimine ait veriler incelendi. 1066 Kamu, Özel ve Üniversite Hastaneleri Çalışanlarının dosya ve arşiv kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmada sonuç olarak ön test puanı medyanı sırasıyla, 70 iken, eğitim verildikten sonra son test puanlarına bakıldığında ortalama 80 puana çıktı. Özel ve Üniversite hastaneleri katılımcılarının, kamu katılımcılarına oranla bilgi düzeyinde anlamlı farklılık mevcuttur. Komisyon üyesi olanlarda, olmayanlara oranla bilgi düzeyinde anlamlı farklılık mevcuttur. Hastane afet ve acil durumu planı hazırlığından sorumlu personelin HAP Uygulayıcı Eğitimi alması, hastane çalışanlarının tamamının ise HAP ve afet konusunda farkındalık ve hizmet içi eğitimler alması önem arz etmektedir. Anahtar kelimeler: Afet, Acil, Eğitim, HAP

2020-06-01T00:00:00Z, Peker, Kadriye, EDEN, ECE, AK, ASLI TOPALOĞLU, UYSAL, ÖMER, Bermek, Gulcin, UYSAL, ÖMER

Background As patient-reported outcome, the Child Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (C-OIDP) has been commonly used for assessing children-s oral health needs in order to facilitate oral health service planning. It was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Turkish in 2008. Since then, there is no study to assess its psychometric properties in Turkish child population. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties and factor structure of the Turkish version of the C-OIDP for use in Turkish primary school children. Methods The Turkish translated version was tested on a convenience sample of primary school children aged 11 to 12 years attending two public schools in Istanbul. Data were collected by clinical examinations, face-to-face interviews and self-completed questionnaires. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion related validity (concurrent and discriminant) were evaluated. Results A total of 208 children were subjected to the tested the C-OIDP. Overall, 93.7% of them reported at least one oral impact in the last 3 months. The most frequently affected performances were -eating- (72.1%) and -cleaning mouth-, while the performance with the lowest impact was -studying- (13%). The internal consistency and reproducibility of the C-OIDP were acceptable, with a Cronbach-s alpha of 0.73 and an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.83. The EFA yielded a two-factor model termed -functional limitation- and -psychosocial limitation-. CFA identified the two- factor model which fit the data better than the previously proposed three-factor model, namely physical, psychological and social health. Having malocclusion, the presence of gum disease, reported history of oral problems in the mouth, dissatisfaction with oral health, bad self-rated oral health and having a problem-oriented pattern of dental attendance were found to be the most important factors related to worse oral health- related quality of life, supporting its criterion-related validity. Conclusion This study provided preliminary evidence the psychometric properties of the C-OIDP index among Turkish school children aged 11-12 years. It may be applied to evaluate the oral health impact on quality of life in this population.

2020-07-06T00:00:00Z, Aştı, T, İlhan, NESRİN, Telli, S, Temel, B, İLHAN, NESRİN, AŞTI, TÜRKINAZ

2017-04-01, Peker, Kadriye, Kose, Taha Emre, Guray, Beliz, Uysal, Omer, Erdem, Tamer Lutfi, UYSAL, ÖMER

Objective: To culturally adapt the Turkish version of Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (TREALD-30) for Turkish-speaking adult dental patients and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

2020-05-01T00:00:00Z, İlhan, NESRİN, Gencer, S, Özdemir, Ö, Maviyildiz, S, İLHAN, NESRİN, GENCER, SÜMEYYE

2020-01-07T00:00:00Z, Taşlıdere, B, Biberci, Keskin, Şentürk, H, İnce, ALİ TÜZÜN, Gülen, B, BİBERCİ KESKİN, ELMAS, TAŞLIDERE, BAHADIR, KOÇHAN, KORAY, İNCE, ALİ TÜZÜN, ŞENTÜRK, HAKAN

OBJECTIVES:Timely identification of patients with acute pancreatitis who are likely to have a severe disease course is critical. Based on that, many scoring systems have been developed throughout the years. Although many of them are currently in use, none of them has been proven to be ideal. In this study, we aimed to compare the discriminatory power of relatively newer risk scores with the historical ones for predicting in-hospital major adverse events, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rate.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients who had been admitted due to acute pancreatitis were retrospectively investigated. Five risk scoring systems including HAPS, Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, and JSS were calculated using the data of the first 24h of admission. Predictive accuracy of each scoring system was calculated using the area under the receiver-operating curve method.RESULTS:Overall 690 patients were included in the study. In-hospital major adverse events were observed in 139 (20.1%) patients of whom, 19 (2.5%) died during hospitalization. 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission were observed in 22 (3.2%) and 27 (3.9%) patients respectively. Negative predictive value of each score was markedly higher compared to positive predictive values. Among all, JSS scoring system showed the highest AUC values across all end-points (0.80 for in-hospital major adverse events; 0.94 for in-hospital mortality; 0.91 for 30-day mortality). However, all five scoring systems failed to predict 30-day readmission.DISCUSSION:JSS was the best classifier among all five risk scoring systems particularly owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value

2020-11-09T00:00:00Z, Kilicoglu, MS, Yurdakul, Ozan Volkan, Bagcier, F, YURDAKUL, OZAN VOLKAN

2019-04-01, Harris, David C. H., DAVIES, Simon J., Finkelstein, Fredric O., JHA, Vivekanand, DONNER, Jo-Ann, ABRAHAM, Georgi, Bello, Aminu K., CASKEY, Fergus J., GARCIA GARCIA, Guillermo, HARDEN, Paul, KAZANCIOĞLU, RÜMEYZA TURAN, Hemmelgarn, Brenda, JOHNSON, David W., LEVIN, Nathan W., Luyckx, Valerie A., MARTIN, Dominique E., McCulloch, Mignon I., MOOSA, Mohammed Rafique, O'Connell, Philip J., Okpechi, Ikechi G., PECOITS FILHO, Roberto, SHAH, Kamal D., SOLA, Laura, Swanepoel, Charles, Tonelli, Marcello, TWAHIR, Ahmed, VAN BIESEN, Wim, VARGHESE, Cherian, Yang, Chih-Wei, ZUNIGA, Carlos, ABU ALFA, Ali K., ALJUBORI, Harith M., ALRUKHAIMI, Mona N., ANDREOLI, Sharon P., ASHUNTANTANG, Gloria, Bellorin-Font, Ezequiel, BERNIEH, Bassam, IBHAIS, Fuad M., BLAKE, Peter G., BROWN, Mark, BROWN, Edwina, BUNNAG, Sakarn, CHAN, Tak Mao, CHEN, Yuqing, CLAURE-DEL GRANADO, Rolando, CLAUS, Stefaan, COLLINS, Allan, COPPO, Rosanna, COUCHOUD, Cecile, CUETO-MANZANO, Alfonso, CULLIS, Brett, DOUTHAT, Walter, DREYER, Gavin, EIAM-ONG, Somchai, EKE, Felicia U., Feehally, John, GHNAIMAT, Mohammad A., LEONG, Bak, HASSAN, Mohamed H., HOU, Fan Fan, JAGER, Kitty, KALANTAR-ZADEH, Kamyar, Levin, Adeera, LIEW, Adrian, McKnight, Marla, TADESSE, Yewondwassesn, Morton, Rachael L., Muller, Elmi, Murtagh, Fliss E. M., Naicker, Saraladevi, Nangaku, Masaomi, NIANG, Abdou, OBRADOR, Gregorio T., OSSAREH, Shahrzad, Perl, Jeffrey, RAHMAN, Muhibur, RASHID, Harun Ur, RICHARDS, Marie, RONDEAU, Eric, SAHAY, Manisha, SALEH, Abdulkarim, SCHNEDITZ, Daniel, TCHOKHONELIDZE, Irma, TESAR, Vladimir, Trask, Michele, TUNGSANGA, Kriang, VACHHARAJANI, Tushar, WALKER, Rachael C., WALKER, Robert, WERE, Anthony J. O., YAO, Qiang, YEATES, Karen, YU, Xueqing, ZAKHAROVA, Elena, ZEMCHENKOV, Alexander, Turan Kazancıoğlu, Rümeyza, Zhao, Ming-Hui, KAZANCIOĞLU, RÜMEYZA

The global nephrology community recognizes the need for a cohesive strategy to address the growing problem of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In March 2018, the International Society of Nephrology hosted a summit on integrated ESKD care, including 92 individuals from around the globe with diverse expertise and professional backgrounds. The attendees were from 41 countries, including 16 participants from 11 low- and lower-middle-income countries. The purpose was to develop a strategic plan to improve worldwide access to integrated ESKD care, by identifying and prioritizing key activities across 8 themes: (i) estimates of ESKD burden and treatment coverage, (ii) advocacy, (iii) education and training/workforce, (iv) financing/funding models, (v) ethics, (vi) dialysis, (vii) transplantation, and (viii) conservative care. Action plans with prioritized lists of goals, activities, and key deliverables, and an overarching performance framework were developed for each theme. Examples of these key deliverables include improved data availability, integration of core registry measures and analysis to inform development of health care policy; a framework for advocacy; improved and continued stakeholder engagement; improved workforce training; equitable, efficient, and cost-effective funding models; greater understanding and greater application of ethical principles in practice and policy; definition and application of standards for safe and sustainable dialysis treatment and a set of measurable quality parameters; and integration of dialysis, transplantation, and comprehensive conservative care as ESKD treatment options within the context of overall health priorities. Intended users of the action plans include clinicians, patients and their families, scientists, industry partners, government decision makers, and advocacy organizations. Implementation of this integrated and comprehensive plan is intended to improve quality and access to care and thereby reduce serious health-related suffering of adults and children affected by ESKD worldwide.