Publication:
Comparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTaşlıdere, B
dc.contributor.authorBiberci, Keskin
dc.contributor.authorŞentürk, H
dc.contributor.authorİnce, ALİ TÜZÜN
dc.contributor.authorGülen, B
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBİBERCİ KESKİN, ELMAS
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTAŞLIDERE, BAHADIR
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKOÇHAN, KORAY
dc.contributor.institutionauthorİNCE, ALİ TÜZÜN
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞENTÜRK, HAKAN
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T20:59:26Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T20:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-07T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES:Timely identification of patients with acute pancreatitis who are likely to have a severe disease course is critical. Based on that, many scoring systems have been developed throughout the years. Although many of them are currently in use, none of them has been proven to be ideal. In this study, we aimed to compare the discriminatory power of relatively newer risk scores with the historical ones for predicting in-hospital major adverse events, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rate.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Patients who had been admitted due to acute pancreatitis were retrospectively investigated. Five risk scoring systems including HAPS, Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, and JSS were calculated using the data of the first 24h of admission. Predictive accuracy of each scoring system was calculated using the area under the receiver-operating curve method.RESULTS:Overall 690 patients were included in the study. In-hospital major adverse events were observed in 139 (20.1%) patients of whom, 19 (2.5%) died during hospitalization. 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission were observed in 22 (3.2%) and 27 (3.9%) patients respectively. Negative predictive value of each score was markedly higher compared to positive predictive values. Among all, JSS scoring system showed the highest AUC values across all end-points (0.80 for in-hospital major adverse events; 0.94 for in-hospital mortality; 0.91 for 30-day mortality). However, all five scoring systems failed to predict 30-day readmission.DISCUSSION:JSS was the best classifier among all five risk scoring systems particularly owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value
dc.identifier.citationBiberci K., Taşlıdere B., Koçhan K., Gülen B., İnce A. T. , Şentürk H., -Comparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events.-, Gastroenterologia y hepatologia, 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.10.008
dc.identifier.pubmed31924368
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.bezmialem.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12645/13280
dc.titleComparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events.
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id0494a134-2165-4546-818e-44385ce9eb68
local.publication.goal04 - Nitelikli Eğitim
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication970f9eb4-1be0-4bd2-ba93-371a0049b85b
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc3a1f40b-abfb-41fc-ac37-c541ff5cc173
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb76fc646-d4e6-42fc-86d4-534d33d0b6c9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6daa6ab7-ee45-4f50-9e71-e831046b6462
relation.isAuthorOfPublication278fcf63-3b92-4368-bff6-f140ebd9aeb3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery278fcf63-3b92-4368-bff6-f140ebd9aeb3
relation.isGoalOfPublication7d3548dc-23d0-4a45-ad2f-280fd2b4bc3d
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7d3548dc-23d0-4a45-ad2f-280fd2b4bc3d
Files
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler