Publication:
Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKOCAMAN, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorBAYSAL, Birol
dc.contributor.authorSenturk, HAKAN
dc.contributor.authorInce, ALİ TÜZÜN
dc.contributor.authorMUSLUMANOGLU, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorKOCAKOC, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorARICI, Sema
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Omer
dc.contributor.authorYILDIZ, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorTURKDOGAN, Kursat
dc.contributor.authorDANALIOGLU, Ahmet
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞENTÜRK, HAKAN
dc.contributor.institutionauthorİNCE, ALİ TÜZÜN
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUYSAL, ÖMER
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T22:06:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-05T22:06:58Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: To retrospectively compare the efficacy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endosonography (EUS) in the staging of rectal carcinoma. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 patients (36 male, 14 female) were included in the study. The data from surgical staging were used as reference for comparing the yield of EUS, MRI, and MDCT in preoperative T and N staging of rectal carcinoma. Comparisons were based on the chi-square test. Results: The mean age+SD of the patients were 60±12 years (range; 28-80). The distribution of rectal tumors according to the T and N staging in surgical pathology was as following: T1 (n:2), T2 (n:15), T3 (n:22), T4 (n:11); N0 (n:22), N1-2 (n:28). The accuracy rate of EUS was statistically higher than that of MDCT (92% vs 64%; p<0.01) and that of MRI (92% vs 72%; p<0.01) for T2 tumors. For T3 tumors, EUS had statistically better accuracy of staging compared to MDCT (90% vs 58%; p<0.01) and MRI (90% vs 60%; p<0.01). As for T4 tumors, the accuracy rate of EUS was higher compared to MRI (98% vs 80%; p<0.01). There was no statistical difference in accuracy rates for detection of lymph nodes across the modalities (EUS, 84%; MDCT 76%; MRI 70%; p=not significant). Conclusion: EUS appears more accurate in T staging compared to MDCT and MRI in rectal carcinoma. Regarding nodal staging, performance of EUS, MDCT and MRI are similar.en
dc.identifier10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63611-5
dc.identifier.citationKOCAMAN O., BAYSAL B., Senturk H., Ince A. T. , MUSLUMANOGLU M., KOCAKOC E., ARICI S., Uysal O., YILDIZ K., TURKDOGAN K., et al., -Staging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience-, TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, cilt.25, ss.669-673, 2014
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tjg.2014.6214
dc.identifier.pubmed25599779
dc.identifier.scopus84920405915
dc.identifier.trdizinISSN: 1300-4948 / 2148-5607
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12645/8944
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000349080900013
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleStaging of rectal carcinoma: MDCT, MRI or EUS. Single center experience
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.article.journalnameJOURNAL OF UROLOGY
local.avesis.idde50eb18-6378-4364-9847-cfee5bb7f876
local.avesis.response8820
local.publication.isinternational1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication278fcf63-3b92-4368-bff6-f140ebd9aeb3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6daa6ab7-ee45-4f50-9e71-e831046b6462
relation.isAuthorOfPublication19df24c5-c3e8-4158-8eed-717f885c608d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery278fcf63-3b92-4368-bff6-f140ebd9aeb3
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
63-10.5152-tjg.2014.6214.pdf
Size:
103.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Yayınlar - Eserler
Tıp Fakültesi