Person:
SEVEN, GÜLSEREN

Loading...
Profile Picture
Google ScholarScopusORCIDPublons
Status
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Job Title
First Name
GÜLSEREN
Last Name
SEVEN
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors from Leiomyomas Using a Neural Network Trained on Endoscopic Ultrasonography Images.
    (2021-10-07T00:00:00Z) Seven, GÜLSEREN; Silahtaroglu, Gokhan; Seven, Ozden Ozluk; Senturk, Hakan; SEVEN, GÜLSEREN
    Background: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is crucial to diagnose and evaluate gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs). However, EUS-guided biopsy does not always differentiate gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from leiomyomas. We evaluated the ability of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to differentiate GISTs from leiomyomas using EUS images. The conventional EUS features of GISTs were also compared with leiomyomas. Patients and methods: Patients who underwent EUS for evaluation of upper GIMTs between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and 145 patients (73 women and 72 men; mean age 54.8 ± 13.5 years) with GISTs (n = 109) or leiomyomas (n = 36), confirmed by immunohistochemistry, were included. A total of 978 images collected from 100 patients were used to train and test the CNN system, and 384 images from 45 patients were used for validation. EUS images were also evaluated by an EUS expert for comparison with the CNN system. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CNN system for diagnosis of GIST were 92.0%, 64.3%, and 86.98% for the validation dataset, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the EUS expert interpretations were 60.5%, 74.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. Concerning EUS features, only higher echogenicity was an independent and significant factor for differentiating GISTs from leiomyomas (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The CNN system could diagnose GIMTs with higher accuracy than an EUS expert and could be helpful in differentiating GISTs from leiomyomas. A higher echogenicity may also aid in differentiation.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Correlation of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Features with the Mitotic Index in 2- to 5-cm Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
    (2021-04-01T00:00:00Z) Seven, Gulseren; Arici, Dilek Sema; Senturk, HAKAN; SEVEN, GÜLSEREN; ŞENTÜRK, HAKAN
    Background: Predicting the malignancy potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) before resection could improve patient management strategies as gastric GISTs with a low malignancy potential can be safely treated endoscopically, but surgical resection is required for those tumors with a high malignancy potential. This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of 2- to 5-cm gastric GISTs that might be used to predict their mitotic index using surgical specimens as the gold standard. Patients and methods: Forty-nine patients (30 females and 19 males; mean age 55.1 ± 12.7 years) who underwent EUS examinations, followed by surgical resections of 2- to 5-cm gastric GISTs, were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The mean tumor size was 3.44 ± 0.97 (range 2.1-5.0) cm. A univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in age, sex, and tumor location in the low mitotic index and high mitotic index groups (all p > 0.05). In terms of EUS features, there were no significant differences in the mitotic indexes with respect to the shape, surface lobulation, border regularity, echogenicity, homogeneity, growth patterns, presence of mucosal ulceration, hyperechogenic foci, anechoic spaces, and hypoechoic halos (all p > 0.05). However, the tumor size was larger in the high mitotic index group than that in the low mitotic index group (3.97 ± 1.05 vs. 3.27 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Conventional EUS features are not reliable for predicting the mitotic index of 2- to 5-cm gastric GISTs. Further modalities for predicting the mitotic index are needed to prevent unnecessary surgical resections in patients with a low risk of malignancy.