Person:
TİMOÇİN, GİZEM

Profile Picture
Status
Kurumdan Ayrılmıştır
Organizational Units
OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit
Job Title
First Name
GİZEM
Last Name
TİMOÇİN
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Filters

2016 - 20205
Reset filters

Settings

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Relationships of Language Lateralization with Diffusion Tensor Imaging Metrics of Corpus Callosum, Tumor Grade, and Tumors Distance to Language-Eloquent Areas in Glial Neoplasms
    (2020-11-01T00:00:00Z) Timocin, Gizem; TOPRAK, ALİ; Aralasmak, Ayse; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; TOPRAK, ALİ; ARALAŞMAK, AYŞE
    Purpose
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Co-occurrence of spinal and intracranial tuberculoma in a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
    (2017-02-01) TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; TOPRAK, HÜSEYİN; KURTCAN, SERPİL; ALKAN, ALPAY; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; TOPRAK, HÜSEYİN; KURTCAN, SERPİL; ALKAN, ALPAY
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    T2 Signal Intensity of the Trigeminal Nerve: A New Diagnostic Criteria for Trigeminal Neuralgia?
    (2018-01-01) Hatiboglu, Mustafa A.; KAYA, Ozlem K.; Alkan, ALPAY; Timocin, GİZEM; BADUR, Bahar A.; Bilgin, MEHMET; ALKAN, ALPAY; HATİBOĞLU, MUSTAFA AZİZ; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; BİLGİN, MEHMET
    Objectives: The objectives of this study were to: 1) compare the size and T2 signal intensity of the trigeminal nerves on the symptomatic side and asymptomatic side of the patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and to correlate these morphological findings with each other in order to assess whether Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can provide evidence of microstructural changes in the affected trigeminal nerve that could be potential imaging markers for diagnosis and monitoring trigeminal neuralgia 2) correlate these data with the pain score of the patients in order to search a quantitative evaluation method of the pain in patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Pediatric pancreaticopleural fistula: magnetic resonance imaging findings
    (2016-01-01) Aydın, SİNEM; SHARIFOV, RASUL; KURTCAN, SERPİL; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; ALKAN, ALPAY; AYDIN, SİNEM; SHARIFOV, RASUL; KURTCAN, SERPİL; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; ALKAN, ALPAY
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Analysis of Appendiceal Neoplasms on 3544 Appendectomy Specimens for Acute Appendicitis: Retrospective Cohort Study of a Single Institution
    (2018-06-27) Destek, Sebahattin; Bektasoglu, HÜSEYİN KAZIM; Unver, NURCAN; Aydogan, CEYHUN; Timocin, GİZEM; KUNDUZ, ENVER; BEKTAŞOĞLU, HÜSEYİN KAZIM; ÜNVER, NURCAN; AYDOĞAN, CEYHUN; TİMOÇİN, GİZEM; DESTEK, SABAHATTİN
    BACKGROUND Appendiceal neoplasms are rare and generally determined in appendectomy specimens for acute appendicitis. Depending on a tumor's histopathology and size, appendectomy or right hemicolectomy are the surgical treatment options. Adenocarcinomas, mucinous neoplasms, goblet cell carcinoids and neuroendocrine tumors are the types of the primary appendiceal neoplasm histopathology. In this study, we aimed to determine the incidence of appendiceal neoplasms in an acute appendicitis cohort. Also, histopathological distributions, demographic data, preoperative radiological diagnosis, and intraoperative findings were revealed for analysis, retrospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between October 2011 and September 2017, 3554 appendectomies were performed for acute appendicitis in Bezmialem University Hospital, Istanbul Turkey. The medical records of these consecutive 3554 patients were evaluated retrospectively. After the histopathological analysis of the appendectomy specimens, a total of 28 patients were detected as having appendiceal neoplasm including appendiceal adenocarcinoma, low grade mucinous neoplasia, and appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors. RESULTS Appendiceal neoplasms were determined in 28 out of 3554 acute appendicitis patients with an incidence of 0.78%. According to the histopathological types, 3 of the cases (10.7%) were appendiceal adenocarcinoma, 8 of the cases (28.5%) were low grade mucinous neoplasia, and 17 of the cases (60.8%) were neuroendocrine tumors. The overall incidence of the appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors was 0.48%. CONCLUSIONS The information obtained from our study suggests that pathological examination of the specimen may not be necessary if there is no doubt according to preoperative radiological diagnosis and/or intraoperative findings of the surgeon.