Person:
ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF

Loading...
Profile Picture
Google ScholarScopusORCIDPublons
Status
Organizational Units
Job Title
First Name
ÖZGÜN YUSUF
Last Name
ÖZYILMAZ
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • PublicationMetadata only
    Evaluation of various denture cleansers on color stability and surface topography of polyetherketoneketone, polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylate
    (2020-08-01T00:00:00Z) ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF; AKIN, CEYDA; KARA, ÖZLEM; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF; KARA, ÖZLEM
    The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sodium perborate effervescent tablets and citric acid solution on the color stability and surface topography of a new generation of high-performance polymer polyetherketoneketone (PEKK), thermoinjection-molded polyamide, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Fifty disc-shaped specimens were fabricated (10 mm x 2 mm) from PEKK (P group), polyamide (D group), and PMMA (M group). These groups were divided into five subgroups (n= 10) according to the storage media. The test groups were immersed in the following solutions: distilled water (Control), Corega, Protefix, Perlodent, and Curaprox. The color stability values (Delta E) were measured using a spectrophotometer before and after immersion in distilled water and four different denture cleansers for 8 hr/day for 140 days. Topography alterations after treatments were assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey-s Honest Significant Difference test. Thep < .05 was considered significant. All denture cleansers increased the Delta Evalues relative to the baseline values in the M, D, and P groups (p < .05). The Perlodent denture cleanser demonstrated the highest Delta Evalue in all groups, which was unacceptable. Curaprox denture cleanser showed the lowest Delta Evalue in the M and D groups (p < .05). Curaprox in all groups showed a increment Evalue less than 3.7. For patients who have PEKK- and polyamide-based prosthesis, the use of citric acid-based cleansers may be more recommended than sodium perborate-containing cleansers because of its clinically acceptable color changes on polymers in terms of color stability.
  • PublicationMetadata only
    Evaluation of the shear bond strength of resin cement to enamel after bleaching with Er: YAG and diode laser
    (2020-05-05T00:00:00Z) Ceyda, Akin; Mujde, Sevimay; Neslihan, Cokuk; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF
    Objective:
  • PublicationMetadata only
    Prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous patients by using the -Toronto hybrid prosthesis-:3 case reports
    (2021-11-06T00:00:00Z) Çalık, Kıymet; Dolanmaz, Doğan; Özyılmaz, Özgün Yusuf; ÇALIK, KIYMET; DOLANMAZ, DOĞAN; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF
  • PublicationMetadata only
    Rehabilitation of partial and total edentulism with Toronto Bridge Prostheses; 3 case reports.
    (2021-11-06T00:00:00Z) Sıncı, Aslı; Kara, Özlem; Dolanmaz, Doğan; Özyılmaz, Özgün Yusuf; SINCI, ASLI; KARA, ÖZLEM; DOLANMAZ, DOĞAN; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Evaluation of Patients- Awareness Levels Regarding Implant And Implant-Supported Prosthesis Who were Admitted to Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Dentistry
    (2022-01-01T00:00:00Z) Davut, Umur; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF; ÖZYILMAZ, ÖZGÜN YUSUF
    Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge level of the totally or partially edentulous patients who were admitted to the Dentistry Faculty of Bezmialem Vakif University and to investigate the factors affecting their ideas when choosing this treatment. Methods: To measure the knowledge level of the patients who were admitted to Faculty of Dentistry and to determine the factors affecting the decision-making processes, a survey was planned. A total of 250 participants were included in the survey. Results: While 57.3% of the participants knew that implant treatment was an alternative treatment, 13.3% of them stated that they had no idea, 29.3% had no opinion at all. When we asked the level of knowledge of the patients about the implant, 16% found it to be quite inadequate and 22% found it very adequate. Of the patients 40.6% stated that they acquired the information from the physician, when they were asked where the information about the implant was obtained. The other sources were friends and family in 24.6%, social media in 16%, internet in 14%, and other sources in 4.6%. While 49.3% of patients preferred implant treatment, they chose the option of being expensive as the biggest factor causing them to think negatively. Conclusion: As a result of the questionnaire, it was concluded that the knowledge level of the patients about implant treatment and the physician were insufficient in the transfer of this information. Further studies should be increased in order to raise awareness among patients.