Person:
ÜŞEN, AHMET

Loading...
Profile Picture
Status
Kurumdan Ayrılmıştır
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Job Title
First Name
AHMET
Last Name
ÜŞEN
Name
Email Address
Birth Date

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
No Thumbnail Available
PublicationMetadata only

The evaluation of mean platelet volume in microscopic polyangiitis: methodological drawbacks

2018-09-01T00:00:00Z, ÜŞEN, Ahmet, ÜŞEN, AHMET

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
PublicationOpen Access

The Impact of Perceived Social Support on Anxiety, Depression and Severity of Pain and Burnout Among Turkish Females With Fibromydigia

2019-06-01T00:00:00Z, GÜNDÜZ, NERMİN, ÜŞEN, Ahmet, Aydin Atar, Emel, ÜŞEN, AHMET

Objectives: This study aims to assess the impact of perceived social support on burnout, severity of pain and comorbid anxiety and depression among Turkish females with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

No Thumbnail Available
PublicationMetadata only

Comparison of responsiveness of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and Duruoz Hand Index in patients with traumatic hand injury

2019-01-01T00:00:00Z, Dogu, Beril, ÜŞEN, Ahmet, Kuran, Banu, Yilmaz, Figen, Sirzai, Hulya, ÜŞEN, AHMET

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures assessing self-reported disability, pain, and function are primary endpoints for determination of optimal treatment strategies in hand-related conditions. In this study, we aimed to compare responsiveness of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), and Duruoz Hand Index (DHI) in patients with traumatic hand injury. METHODS: Consecutive patients with traumatic hand injury who were referred to our polyclinic for rehabilitation were included in the study. Depending on clinical status, patients underwent at least 14 sessions of physical therapy consisting of infrared heating, water submersion ultrasound, electrical stimulation, and exercise. MHQ, DASH, and DHI questionnaires were filled in by all patients both before and 3 months after physical therapy. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study. MHQ (ES = 1.89; SRM = 1.84), DASH (ES = 1.66; SRM = 1.40), and DHI (ES = 1.68; SRM = 1.48) were all highly responsive in traumatic hand injuries. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that MHQ, DASH, and DHI are very responsive questionnaires for detection of treatment-induced changes in patients with traumatic hand injury. We suggest that when it is only intended to assess hand disability or when a quick assessment is desirable, DASH or DHI are more suitable, whereas MHQ will be more useful when a more detailed assessment including pain and aesthetical concerns is required.